top of page
anchorheader

Chinese ‘swarming’ continues as 48 protests filed since June 30


MANILA, Philippines, September 12 ------ The incursion of Chinese vessels into Philippine waters has remained unabated, with the government already filing 48 diplomatic protests against Beijing over the aggressive behavior of its ships in the West Philippine Sea since President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. took office in June, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs.


Foreign Assistant Secretary for Maritime and Ocean Affairs Maria Angela Ponce told the Senate committee on foreign relations that for this year, there have been 172 protests filed against China as of Aug. 31. There were 388 diplomatic protests filed against China under the Duterte administration. The diplomatic protests covered incidents that involved illegal fishing, the illegal presence of Chinese vessels, harassment of fishermen and enforcement agencies, and unauthorized marine scientific research. China claims almost the entire South China Sea, although the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Brunei, and Malaysia have overlapping claims. The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague had ruled in 2016 that Beijing’s nine-dash line and historic rights claims were invalid, a decision Beijing refused to acknowledge. Two protest notes have also been filed against Vietnam, Ponce said. Defense Undersecretary Angelito de Leon said in the same hearing, “The current situation in the West Philippine Sea remains to be worth looking into because there are certain concerns on security.” “In broad strokes, the swarming incidents continue,” he noted.


The Philippines has protested China’s massive fleet operating in the country’s exclusive economic zone on multiple occasions. The last publicized protest was in June, weeks before Mr. Marcos’ predecessor, Rodrigo Duterte, ended his term. De Leon said Chinese incursions have prompted the military and the Philippine Coast Guard to increase maritime domain awareness and maritime patrols. He added that they were also “leveraging our alliances with our partners and allies in conducting exercises to increase our capabilities.” The acquisition of more ships, planes and monitoring equipment through the military modernization program could raise their capacity for maritime patrols, he pointed out. “We have limitations. We do not want to escalate the issue and go into a full-blown military confrontation because of the disproportionate use of force,” De Leon said. Committee chair Sen. Imee Marcos questioned the strategy of filing numerous diplomatic protests against China. “What’s the point of sending hundreds of hundreds of protests aside from, well, annoying both parties?” she asked the officials. “It’s embarrassing when you keep on writing to them, only to be ignored. You lose your dignity and respect, and it doesn’t look good,” she said.


Ponce explained that filing protests was “an assertion of our rights under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the 2016 Arbitral Award.” Foreign Secretary Enrique Manalo agreed that filing diplomatic protests might not succeed on their own and needed to be backed by other means, such as consultations or even summoning a diplomat to convey displeasure. “If we’re just going to rely on a protest note, the odds of anything happening are very rare. That’s why in addition to the notes, we have other ways of supplementing such action,” he said. Fretti Ganchoon, senior state counsel of the Department of Justice, also noted that filing diplomatic notes served a “legal purpose.” “It’s not just record keeping. It’s because we need to prevent the principle of acquiescence. For example, we conduct monthly rotation and resupply missions in the BRP Sierra Madre and each time, China would block us, so we would protest and put on record that we object to this illegal action of China,” she said. “If you commit a crime, on how many counts did you do it? That’s why we file numerous diplomatic protests,” she said.


Source: inquirer.net

Comments


bottom of page